🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations worked, and shared fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is walking a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries employed their right to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Representatives asserted three times they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if talks resume.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be resolved by military means. He said the assaults started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always tried to dictate their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the ultimate resolution to settle disagreements, but its criteria, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more united, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the wake of this attack."