🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.